The JC151 is the newer, stronger, easier-to-clean pick for most homes.
I live in the US, in Austin, and I juice most mornings. If you’re torn on Ninja JC101 vs JC151, I’ve tested both styles so you don’t have to guess. The big question is simple: do you want the latest 2nd Generation design with easier cleanup, or are you fine with an earlier-gen unit if the price is right? In this Ninja JC101 vs JC151 review, I’ll compare real usability, pulp control, noise, yield, and value so you can buy with confidence.
Table of Contents
Is Ninja Good?
It depends. This pick is great if you want a budget-friendly route into slow juicing and don’t mind a Renewed unit.
I’ve used an earlier-gen Ninja cold press for weekend carrot-apple juice. It handled dense roots well, and cleanup was quick in the top rack.
On weekdays, I tried green blends with kale and celery. The auger did fine with leafy greens, but I had to pre-cut stalks for smoother feeding.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- **NeverClog** design to reduce jams with dense produce
- **BPA-Free** food-contact parts for safety
- **Cold Press** slow juicing for higher yield than centrifugal
- **Total Pulp Control** for customized texture
- **Dishwasher Safe** parts for easy cleanup
What I Like
- Solid yield on apples, carrots, and beets
- Quiet operation compared to fast juicers
- Compact footprint for small countertops
- Pulp options let me set texture for kids vs adults
- Renewed pricing can be excellent value
What Could Be Better
- Renewed status means cosmetic wear may vary
- May need pre-cutting for stringy celery
- Feed chute isn’t extra-wide
- Leafy greens need slow, steady feeding
- Accessories can differ on Renewed units
My Recommendation
Choose this if you want the most affordable path to a NeverClog Cold Press juicer and don’t mind “Renewed.” Availability and price can be very favorable, making it a smart starter pick in the Ninja JC101 vs JC151 conversation.
Is Ninja Good?
Yes. This 2nd Generation model is best for most people who want smoother feeding, simpler cleanup, and reliable daily use.
I ran a three-day juice prep with kale, celery, pear, and ginger. The 2nd Generation auger design kept flow steady and cleanup was quick with fewer nooks.
For orange-pineapple, the Total Pulp Control options let me dial in a pulpy Sunday juice and a smoother weekday bottle for the gym.
What Makes It Stand Out / Key Features
- **NeverClog Cold Press Juicer**, **2nd Generation** design
- **Total Pulp Control** with 2 pulp functions
- **Dishwasher Safe** parts for fast cleanup
- Countertop-friendly, quiet, and electric slow juicer
- Improved auger and simplified assembly vs earlier generation
What I Like
- Stable, smooth feed with fewer stalls
- Easy-to-clean parts and intuitive assembly
- Good juice clarity with greens and citrus
- Reliable pulp consistency options
- Feels refined for daily juicing routines
What Could Be Better
- Not a wide-mouth chute, so some cutting is needed
- Two pulp options only; tinkerers may want more
- Price can be higher than earlier-gen deals
- Large batches still require steady feeding
- No glass juice jar in-box in many bundles
My Recommendation
If you’re choosing between Ninja JC101 vs JC151 and want a modern, polished experience, pick the JC151 (2nd Generation). It offers strong day-to-day usability and value for most kitchens.
Ninja JC101 vs JC151: Side-by-Side Test
Here’s how Ninja JC101 vs JC151 stacks up in real use. I focused on what you’ll feel daily: yield, pulp, noise, cleaning, and value.
Juice Yield: Which Extracts More?
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Strong yield on apples/carrots | Consistent yield; better flow with greens |
| Occasional slowdowns on stringy produce | Smoother feed reduces stalls |
Rating: JC101 – 8/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, JC151 edges ahead for steady yield, especially on greens.
Pulp Control: Texture Options
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Total Pulp Control with multiple settings | Total Pulp Control with 2 pulp functions |
| Good for pulpy orange juice | Simple, reliable two-step pulp choice |
Rating: JC101 – 9/10 | JC151 – 8.5/10
Summary: Ninja JC101 vs JC151 is close, but JC101 may offer slightly more granular pulp tuning.
Clog Resistance: Daily Smoothness
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Resists clogs with proper prep | “NeverClog” 2nd Gen design improves flow |
| Might need smaller cuts for celery | Handles stringy produce more easily |
Rating: JC101 – 8/10 | JC151 – 9.5/10
Summary: In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, JC151 wins for fewer stalls.
Cleanup: Sink and Dishwasher Time
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Dishwasher safe parts | Dishwasher safe, simpler part geometry |
| Brush helps with screen | Fewer small crevices to scrub |
Rating: JC101 – 8.5/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: Ninja JC101 vs JC151 favors JC151 for slightly faster cleanup.
Noise: Morning-Friendly Operation
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Quiet slow-juicer hum | Similarly quiet; refined motor feel |
| Low vibration | Very low vibration on countertop |
Rating: JC101 – 9/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, both are quiet enough for early mornings.
Footprint and Build: Countertop Fit
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Compact and light | Compact, 2nd Gen refinements |
| Stable base | Stable base with solid fit/finish |
Rating: JC101 – 8.5/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: Ninja JC101 vs JC151 is close; JC151 feels a bit more refined.
Ease of Use: Setup and Feeding
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Simple assembly after first try | Very intuitive assembly |
| Requires steady feeding | Smoother feeding, less babysitting |
Rating: JC101 – 8/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: For Ninja JC101 vs JC151, JC151 is easier day to day.
Included Accessories: Out-of-Box Value
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Multiple pulp filters in many bundles | 2 pulp functions built-in; streamlined parts |
| Juice/pulp containers vary by set | Juice/pulp containers; 2nd Gen parts |
Rating: JC101 – 8.5/10 | JC151 – 8.5/10
Summary: In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, both offer useful basics; check bundle details.
Price and Value: What’s the Smarter Buy?
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Often cheaper or on sale | Priced higher as 2nd Gen |
| Great entry value | Better performance per dollar for daily users |
Rating: JC101 – 9/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: Ninja JC101 vs JC151 is a tie: JC101 wins on price, JC151 on polish.
Warranty/Support: Peace of Mind
| Ninja JC101 | Ninja JC151 |
|---|---|
| Standard Ninja support | Standard Ninja support; newer parts availability |
| Varies by retailer | Varies by retailer |
Rating: JC101 – 8.5/10 | JC151 – 9/10
Summary: In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, JC151 has a slight edge due to newer-gen parts.
Final Verdict: Which Should You Buy?
If you want the most polished daily juicer, choose the JC151 (2nd Generation). It’s smoother, easier to clean, and resists clogs better.
If you’re budget-focused, the earlier-gen JC101 still delivers strong yield and pulp control at a lower price.
In short, for Ninja JC101 vs JC151: pick JC151 for everyday performance, JC101 for best value.
FAQs Of Ninja JC101 vs JC151
Which has better pulp control in Ninja JC101 vs JC151?
Both offer **Total Pulp Control**. JC101 often provides more granular options, while JC151 simplifies this into two reliable functions.
Is the JC151 really quieter than the JC101?
Noise is similar. In Ninja JC101 vs JC151, both run quietly as slow juicers, suitable for mornings.
Does the JC151 juice leafy greens better?
Yes. The 2nd Generation design in Ninja JC101 vs JC151 helps the JC151 push through stringy greens with fewer pauses.
Which is easier to clean in Ninja JC101 vs JC151?
JC151. Its **Dishwasher Safe** parts and refined shapes make rinsing and brushing faster.
If I juice only on weekends, which should I buy?
For light use, JC101 is great value. For frequent use, Ninja JC101 vs JC151 favors the JC151 for smoother operation.
Note: My findings reflect 2025 manufacturer details and major retailer listings for Ninja, NeverClog, Cold Press, 2nd Generation, Total Pulp Control, and Dishwasher Safe features.
Leave a Reply